Warcraft Thrall Part 2: Transport Issue
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:09 am
Warcraft Thrall Part 2: Transport Issue
Hello, in the second map of Warcraft campaing, there is a lot of ent units, however they cannot be loaded onto the transport ships. This makes them almost useless. Is this intentional or is it an issue?
Re: Warcraft Thrall Part 2: Transport Issue
Before ent could use ships, map need to be changed.
it's still possible to win?
it's still possible to win?
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:09 am
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2021 4:59 am
- Puss_in_Boots
- Posts: 3211
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2017 1:23 am
- Location: New Jersey
Re: Warcraft Thrall Part 2: Transport Issue
This is also a problem in scenario: elf rescue, I think if ents were replaced by woodshapers in these maps (they can transform to ent armor right?) They should allow similar difficulty as before ents were patched out of transports.
OLÉ
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2021 4:59 am
Re: Warcraft Thrall Part 2: Transport Issue
What other unit do you think that fit for this map? I'm trying to update it but I really don't play elves and don't have any of they tech unlocked
- Puss_in_Boots
- Posts: 3211
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2017 1:23 am
- Location: New Jersey
Re: Warcraft Thrall Part 2: Transport Issue
Well, I guess to substitute ent rock thrower, fire archers are the closest thing.
You could also use glade shielder as an ent replacement.
You could also use glade shielder as an ent replacement.
OLÉ
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2021 4:59 am
Re: Warcraft Thrall Part 2: Transport Issue
I found woodshaper a good option but on their normal form, so you can carry them to the boat and on second turn they can pass to other area of the map and transform.
About fire archers I just change rock throwers to normal archer because I don't think they are really necessary for this map, also I just change 2 of the archers near the wizard for dryads so they can "fit" a bit more on the context of warcraft.
If someone think this changes are too much please let me know.
About fire archers I just change rock throwers to normal archer because I don't think they are really necessary for this map, also I just change 2 of the archers near the wizard for dryads so they can "fit" a bit more on the context of warcraft.
If someone think this changes are too much please let me know.
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2021 4:59 am
Re: Warcraft Thrall Part 2: Transport Issue
I tested the map with the new changes and I ended up on 11 turns, near half of what you need for get the 3 stars
- Puss_in_Boots
- Posts: 3211
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2017 1:23 am
- Location: New Jersey
Re: Warcraft Thrall Part 2: Transport Issue
I think that map was always that easy.
11 turns in a big map with many units could take some time, but if you think the player needs to be weaker, you can reduce the amount of woodshapers to just a handful.
11 turns in a big map with many units could take some time, but if you think the player needs to be weaker, you can reduce the amount of woodshapers to just a handful.
OLÉ
- Puss_in_Boots
- Posts: 3211
- Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2017 1:23 am
- Location: New Jersey
Re: Warcraft Thrall Part 2: Transport Issue
Also I think the intended 3 stars was for 25 turns because the map setup says <30 turns = 3 stars, < 25 turns = 2 stars, and >25 turns = 1 star.
OLÉ
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2021 4:59 am
Re: Warcraft Thrall Part 2: Transport Issue
Nah I think it's fine, because you can use the boat for transport units or put bridges and let them pass also yes I change the turns for 3 stars to 25