Upgrades - gem pluralisation IMPLEMENTED

Post Reply
User avatar
Detros
Posts: 460
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2016 12:01 pm

Upgrades - gem pluralisation IMPLEMENTED

Post by Detros » Sun Dec 11, 2016 11:30 pm

Quite a standard issue: "It costs 6 gems, you need 1 more gems". (when you have 5)
Should be just "...1 more gem.", singular.

User avatar
COOLguy
Posts: 4005
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2014 2:58 am
Location: Nenuial, Arnor

Re: Upgrades - gem pluralisation

Post by COOLguy » Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:08 pm

Sounds like a template - is it a big enough deal to track it down and create an exception test?
Thanks!
Josh

User avatar
Detros
Posts: 460
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2016 12:01 pm

Re: Upgrades - gem pluralisation

Post by Detros » Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:04 pm

COOLguy wrote:Sounds like a template - is it a big enough deal to track it down and create an exception test?
That's a question aimed at Daniel, right? Yes, one "if" at the right place should be enough.

Stratego (dev)
Site Admin
Posts: 9401
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:28 pm

Re: Upgrades - gem pluralisation IMPLEMENTED

Post by Stratego (dev) » Sun Jan 01, 2017 5:27 pm

modified to this:
"It costs 6 gems, you need 1 more to get it"

User avatar
Detros
Posts: 460
Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2016 12:01 pm

Re: Upgrades - gem pluralisation IMPLEMENTED

Post by Detros » Sun Jan 01, 2017 8:07 pm

Thanks. So now there should be no upgrades made for 1 gem only :D
Works for me.

User avatar
COOLguy
Posts: 4005
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2014 2:58 am
Location: Nenuial, Arnor

Re: Upgrades - gem pluralisation IMPLEMENTED

Post by COOLguy » Sun Jan 01, 2017 10:31 pm

Daniel (the dev) wrote:modified to this:
"It costs 6 gems, you need 1 more to get it"
Clever fix :)
Thanks!
Josh

Post Reply

Return to “Implemented/Answered”