Age of Strategy Forums

U can suggest ideas on this topic too, its a general framework for china dynasty but still incomplete http://ageofstrategy.net/viewtopic.php?f=76&t=12740&sid=68f2c9c81c2a76dbd73d29f0bb4a786b Also rather than dev, its more us players who r putting stuff in the game lol, u can join us too, may...

We already have cho-ku-nu in game i think

Btw, what if a tech gives roman centurion an aura that increases damage of ballista and catapult (not trebuchet) this tech could require other roman tech like maritime reform and missile tactic so b unique to rome play only, may b it can also give extra armor to siege tower

Wat if a 4 turn unit with 1 carry capacity that can also b sacrificed to give 2 turns of production or 4 turns of merc lasting time

one thing i do believe is that after wagon nerf, poison archers will become meta again if exiting wagons cost action

If grouped together, how about letting them also b made in church?

so every 3 turn u would have like 1 of each?

something related to the role i guess, foot knight may b pure armor, knight dmg, shield knight armor/max hp

Wait if i can make late game royal guard without upgrade tech then i wouldnt need to upgrade the unit...

And definitely no guard tower, he can literally place wagons with legion inside a town and build guard tower next to it, even palisades around town makes it hard to recapture

The problem is anti armored siege infantry with double action buff can almost one shot most armored siege units

I dont remember current build list but i think, palisade palisade gate roads and frisian horse is good enough,

On one hand wagon is good on the otherhand i might b sacrificing workers spam and early factories so mid game i would have lower troops than enemy if i dont keep border tcs, not to mention they get to make forts and other defenses faster than me

not to mention the tech itself cost 6 turn so by the time u have upgraded mangudai enemy would also set up defense towers or only advance with armored siege units so mangudai speed wouldnt b much factor in overall performance then... even a single upgraded skirmisher with archer behind makes mongol ...

Use resize canvas, select 32, 32 px or create new with 32,32 px

@Endru1241 did u check this post?

A player literally spammed palisades around me and blocked me in then rained arrows on me and massacred me... so no

May b add a cloak on leader, same with centurion too, we dont need hundred percent realistic but there should b a prominent difference between strong leader and army soldier, and although head feather is good its not enough cuz the image is too small and not enough space to make it detailed enough ...

Yes units that can climb mountains should b able to climb waterfall

Oh wow, what do u know, centurions do wear a red cloak

May b add a cloak on leader, same with centurion too, we dont need hundred percent realistic but there should b a prominent difference between strong leader and army soldier, and although head feather is good its not enough cuz the image is too small and not enough space to make it detailed enough

It is confusing when u got 10 to 20 infantry all looking similar (aux spearman, swordsman, legionary, praetorian etc.)

Anyways roman although confusing i m used to it now, but spartan and leader needs to look more different i think

Is the feather and shield pattern the only defining difference between leader and soldier?


Ofc u wont find it since u r the owner, but ur opponents definitely feel misled by a weak equites like design

Taxiachros and spartan looks too similar and confusing, similar to that equites/ centurion skin

I didnt notice the addition of high morale aura on daimyo, that does change some things and make it more 7 turn worthy, although it is still a question of whether max boosted centurion with physician, other centurion and even drummer buff is weaker than daimyo or not...

Wat about castle destroyer zerk and gallowglass then?

I can already see first case for winged hussar

What is exact stat now?
Would daimyo turn cost b 6 turn too?

And would nodachi get bonus against buildings or only stay anti light infantry? The problem is light infantry/cav categories can also b killed with archers and not necessarily need a melee, although they might b useful against rome

Also i have noticed even with a lot of senators and inquisitor, it is not necessarily successful against many kinds of harrassing strat and nobody actually sends these units forward without a large meat shield army infront to protect them from possible ambushes, so if played properly their threats c...

Yes after the tournament i come to conclusion that roman is too powerful and doesnt need an extra siege spams to destroy fortifications But may b something else like different faction engineers will b same as worker but may b can make some unique faction siege/building that normal worker cant, while...