Age of Strategy Forums

Once doom's tournament finishes, we should do an unofficial alliance tourney of 8 2-player teams while we wait for the official july tournament, which should be individual. Because July is still a long ways out

i think we should redo the match. the castle incident was a key point there. Anyways, does LagitKiller agree to this rematch? I can easily change the brackets back. Thanks Daniel for offering a rematch, this is quite honorable and I am humbled. The castle was a big deal, but its not like as if I wa...

I have also seen this, it seems to occur randomly and rarely to all types of buildings and build-able units. I don't know how to make it happen though

I just resigned against daniel, I had no way of coming back, good luck to the championship game

This has always been the case, for example if you were building a barracks and were 3 turns out of 4 into it when you finished researching massive walls, it would take another 2-3 turns, for 5-6 turns total. This wasn't that big of a deal, but since now with the new update castles double in hp, if y...

The Confederacy of Allied Leagues, C.A.L. formed about a week ago and remains a formidable and united power bloc. Its founders and only members are Lagitkiller and CelticWarrior, and it was formed in sires and serfs in retaliation of the DCPR

I must petition for Esleys compromising and honour stat to be greatly reduced, for recently in a map he has begun to use 'Ship spam'. When asked about his shameless act, the only reply was 'If you can't beat em.....' Though I hate to side with hardeep, I can testify that esley did ship spam on Sire...

Yeah, he resigned after i took a town and was going to take another the next turn, it was hard to impossible for him to come back. It was a good game river raider

In better news, RiverRaider and LagitKiller are unresponsive, so we have plenty of time to figure out if this can be fixed :) We're still playing our game, its a pretty even battle, so not much progress in being made in terms of the game coming to an end. We both still have 9 towns each. About 10 t...

I dont think so, and i still see them being way overused in multiplayer, especially by those who arent so good. Even if the only change is to 15 attack instead of 17, that would be fine

1. Viking
2. Scottish Highlander
3. Delayed warfare mode

To the game engine, but it is not an extreme tie

COOLguy wrote:(Just out of curiosity, which politics best describes you?)

I think globalist might be a little extreme because I do not wish to take over the WHOLE world, just most of it. But for labeling purposes, globalist is probably appropriate. And I am of course a dictator, like any good globalist.

I must admit that I find no hesitation in declaring war on otherwise neutral nations in a desire to expand the wealth of my own people (and myself of course). However, I find it illegitimate and completely propagandist to rank me a 0 in honor, because while I may not accept many treaties, I have nev...

Everyone knows this, it is already been reported and everyone uses this too. I know, that's why i didn't report it when I first found out. The thing is, in star wars strategy it's fixed, so I don't see why the dev shouldn't be able to fix it in the regular version also. A solution has already been ...

I discovered that if in the middle of taking your turn you close the app, not just exit, but actually close it, and you do it quickly, your game is not saved. It seems like something you would want to avoid, but it can be useful for times when something doesnt turn out right, for example a missed co...

My game with river raider is progressing very slowly, we haven't even made contact yet. Currently he is not taking his turn, should I skip him to prevent further delay? Or just wait?

A problem with this would be time. Games are long enough as it is, so can you imagine if there are sets of games, where if players trade territories back and forth with each other there could be dozens of games?

Players start "owning" an area of the map. Players take turns "attacking" territories. When a territory is attacked, a game is held on the map. If the attacker wins the game, theyntake over the territory. This is a similar setup to total war games, anyone ever played? This would...

I find the jedi units far overpowered. One jedi can beat 10 rebels, which is accurate, but makes the game unbalanced. They only do one hp damage to a jedi. I think we should bend its accuracy, or if you really want to be accurate, make it like 20 turns to train a jedi, seeing as it takes a lifetime ...

I would like to join

Made a map, really fair setup actually, 9 towns each, called Lagit vs. River

I would like to join

My friends and I have played where we set tcs and boundaries for each player and prohibit attacking each other for the first fifteen turns. This better mimicks real warfare, where defenses and armies are often built up before the outbreak of war. However, sometimes someone forgets to stand ground on...

Taking away his counter-attack could be interesting, it would make him a unique unit. If that is done though, he should be given 1/0 or 2/0 armor though, probably 1/0, so he doesn't get completely mauled by weak units

Neat idea, but if you are facing a highlander on full health, can't you just not attack him? Since he would deal only one hp damage, if I were up against one, I would leave him alone, at least until I could wipe him out in a single turn.

The maceman is overpowered and because of that overused. No units have a bonus against the maceman and all units should have a weakness(es). Maceman is likened to an elite version of swordsman, whose major weakness is cavalry, yet maceman does more damage to cavalry than cavalry do to him. Having su...

The maceman is supposed to be an elite version of the swordsman, whose weakness is cavalry, yet the maceman does more damage to cavalry than cavalry do to him. I just think the maceman is overpowered and now because of that overused. No units have a bonus against him. All units should have at least ...